Law Firm News
Today's Date: Bookmark This Website
Railroad Denies Liability for Smuggled Drugs
Attorney Legal Opinions | 2008/08/04 07:31
In a sharply worded federal complaint, the Union Pacific Railroad Co. asserts that it is not responsible for the cocaine and marijuana seized on railroad cars as part of a smuggling operation of trains bound for the United States from Mexico.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection found 47 cases of illegal narcotics seized at checkpoints in California, Arizona and Texas. In each case, the Border Patrol found illegal drugs on a train bound for the United States from a Mexican railroad.

Though the trains were ultimately headed to Union Pacific customers, the railroad company claims that it should not have to pay the $37.7 million in proposed penalties against it, because the drugs were found before the railroad cars ever came into Union Pacific's possession.

At all times prior to the discovery of the illegal narcotics, either the Mexican railroad operating the train of (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) had exclusive control of the trains in which they were found, the plaintiff claims.

It rejects the defendant's assertion that Union Pacific failed to exercise the highest degree of care and diligence to ensure drugs were not smuggled on its trains. Union Pacific points out that it owns no railroad facilities in Mexico, and cannot hire, supervise or direct the railroad employees across the border.

The government improperly applied the Tariff Act of 1930 in assessing fines against Union Pacific, the lawsuit claims.

The Tariff Act does not obligate (Union Pacific) to enter Mexico and conduct extraterrestrial inspections, the railroad claims, and to do so would require (Union Pacific) to take extraordinarily dangerous and costly measures that the United States itself has found too dangerous and/or futile to undertake.

The risk of setting up security operations in Mexico would expose the plaintiff and its employees to the risks of murder and mayhem at the hands of Mexican drug cartels, while at the same time potentially running afoul of Mexican law, the lawsuit states.

And it would accomplish nothing, the railroad claims.

If (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) and the full power of the United States government cannot effectively seize drugs in Mexico, there is no reason to believe that (Union Pacific) could.


[PREV] [1] ..[1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998].. [2190] [NEXT]
All
Law Firm Legal News
Attorney Legal Opinions
Lawyer World News
Court and Trial
Legal News Interview
Trending Legal Issues
Top Attorney News
Recent Court Cases
Latest Law Firm Issues
Judge to weigh Louisiana AG..
Trump says he’s in ‘no rus..
Trump says he’s in ‘no rus..
HK defends its immigration p..
Ex-UK lawmaker charged with ..
Court sides with the FDA in ..
US immigration officials loo..
Trump asks supreme court to ..
Turkish court orders key Erd..
Trump administration says So..
Austria’s new government is..
Mexico says it will impose r..
Trump signs order designatin..
Trump administration says it..
Defense secretary defends Pe..


   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Francisco Copyright Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
New York Adoption Lawyers
New York Foster Care Lawyers
Adoption Pre-Certification
www.lawrsm.com
 
 
© www.legal-news-world.com. All rights reserved.

These articles provided on the web site has been prepared by Legal News World as a service for the legal community and is not meant to be seen as professional legal advice. These contents do not substitute for a consultation with a licensed attorney for your legal matters. Legal News World is intended to give you the latest updates on the hot legal topics going on in the world. It not be used to assess a specific legal situation.Lawyers Web Design by Law Promo.